Regarding Protocol Deviation [GxP / QC / QA]

posted by Prashanth  – 2009-02-12 13:08 (6333 d 17:46 ago) – Posting: # 3229
Views: 7,393

Dear Pravin,

as per the information available:

based on the In house SOP title protocol deviation, the criticality should be mentioned in the SOP based upon the design and the process separately in the study.

To the mentioned case, Are you speaking with respect to P1 or P2, type of study, type of drug, type of release of drug,A DME of the drug, amount of water consumed and what time before the predose.

Does the protocol defines the protocol deviation to what extent?

Based on the criticality withrespect to the process related error,it can be considered as protocol deviation and can be included in the study(Keeping the ethical issues with respect to the volunteer) on discussion with PK department and PI.

If any clarification kinldy let me know.

Best Regards,
Prashanth

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
148 visitors (0 registered, 148 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:54 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5