LLOQ / Cmax [GxP / QC / QA]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2008-11-24 13:54 (6013 d 07:54 ago) – Posting: # 2787
Views: 20,157

Dear Shankar,

please read Ohlbe's post first! Since you have agreed to comply with the Forum's policy during registration, I will block your account if you fail to do so.

❝ I could not find in guidelines the criterial for selecting LLOQ.


Did you search the Guideline collection? In many guidelines it's mentioned that AUCT/AUCinf >80% AUCinf. With knowledge of the pharmacokinetics of the drug and it's variability it's up to you to come up with a suitable working range for the method (both ULOQ and LLOQ).

❝ Some articles mention it to by 1/100 to 1/32 of the Cmax and some authors used that too.


Stupid enough.

❝ And industry practice seems to be 5%-10 % or Cmax.


ACK, but stupid as well.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,671 registered users;
117 visitors (0 registered, 117 guests [including 72 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:48 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you shut your door to all errors
truth will be shut out.    Rabindranath Tagore

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5