Case Report Form (CRF) as source data [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2024-06-25 19:42 (376 d 07:59 ago) – Posting: # 24037
Views: 2,935

Dear Mais,

❝ [...] summarizing CRF corrections would require us to examine each page of the CRFs, compile a list of corrections, and then have them double-checked by another quality control individual.


I think you are over-interpreting GCP 8.3.15. What is required is that corrections to the CRF be documented (as described in § 4.9.3), not that a list of such corrections be generated. If corrections are made as described in § 4.9.3 (which would be required to meet the ALCOA+ principles anyway), and you are archiving the corrected CRF pages, then you are achieving what is required in 8.3.15 (To document all changes/additions or corrections made to CRF after initial data were recorded).

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,427 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,678 registered users;
38 visitors (0 registered, 38 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:42 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

No matter what side of the argument you are on,
you always find people on your side
that you wish were on the other.    Thomas Berger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5