A small point for the code [GxP / QC / QA]

posted by sameep – India, 2022-06-01 15:17 (1463 d 14:13 ago) – Posting: # 23037
Views: 19,048

Dear Helmut,

❝ for (i in 3:n)


Works for all crossover datasets, whereas

❝ for (i in subj:n) {


Works only if the sequence for the first two subjects is the same. If the first two subject's sequences are different (i.e. TR and RT), then it gives the below error, as calculations are not feasible due to zero degree of freedom.

Error in power.TOST(CV = res$CV[i - 1], theta0 = res$PE[i - 1], n = length(unique(tmp$Subject))) :
  n too small. Degrees of freedom <1!
In addition: Warning messages:
1: In qt(a, object$df.residual) : NaNs produced
2: In anova.lm(m) :
  ANOVA F-tests on an essentially perfect fit are unreliable


❝ I was only talking about importing the data from xls(x).


This is what I meant.

❝ I’m still working on the script (in the meantime a monster with 525 lines of code), allowing not only 2×2×2 but also higher-order crossovers. Not fail-safe.


Thanks in advance, looking forward to the goodie.

Regards,
Sameep.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
216 visitors (0 registered, 216 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:31 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5