regarding elevation of lab parameters [GxP / QC / QA]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2014-09-02 09:40 (4302 d 06:40 ago) – Posting: # 13451
Views: 5,867

Hello Varsha,

I think your finding is quite out of the ordinary and interesting, and not necessarily alarming.
I assume and hope all AEs have resolved.

I would definitely look into this. Visit the lab, be physically present, open books, check data, instruments/calibrations and whodunnit. Look into your own records to check if you have subjects in other trials analysed for ESR in the same timeframe, and review their ESR's as well. And ask if other trials recently have been associated with weird ESR issues (which they might not be willing to share with you).

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
100 visitors (0 registered, 100 guests [including 24 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:21 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To propose that poor design can be corrected by subtle analysis techniques
is contrary to good scientific thinking.    Stuart J. Pocock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5