QC # QA [GxP / QC / QA]

posted by joy_fm – Indonesia, 2014-01-17 14:42 (4530 d 09:45 ago) – Posting: # 12187
Views: 25,854

Dear Mahesh M,
Thank u, I absolutely agree with your opinion.

Dear Helmutz,
Can u explain about this statement

❝ However, if data come from external sources I don’t get the point why the data-import (analytics, lab values ⇒ statistics) should not be checked 100%. Takes about one hour for an average study.


In my opinion, it will take at least two days to check 100% raw data. How to check 100% raw data in one hour ? What's your checking point ?


Best regards
Joy_fm


Edit: Standard quotes restored, post linked. [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
147 visitors (0 registered, 147 guests [including 37 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:27 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To propose that poor design can be corrected by subtle analysis techniques
is contrary to good scientific thinking.    Stuart J. Pocock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5