Cmax value higher than AUC [PK / PD]

posted by Dr_Dan  – Germany, 2015-02-17 09:11 (4140 d 18:24 ago) – Posting: # 14434
Views: 17,561

Hi ElMaestro

❝ It doesn't make sense. At least not to me.

❝ AUCt is a concentration integrated over time, Cmax is a concentration.


You are right that msnaimar can not directly compare two different units on the one hand but on the other hand the question is reasonable. Is it possible that Cmax > AUCt? IMHO not. Cmax just represents one point of the curve (o.k. it is the highest) but AUC represents all points under the curve i.e. Cmax + all the rest and therefore the value for AUC must be >> as the value for Cmax provided that you use the same dimension for concentration (in our case ng/ml), right?
Please explain if I am completely wrong
Kind regards
Dr_Dan

Kind regards and have a nice day
Dr_Dan

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
134 visitors (0 registered, 134 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:35 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5