Lottery: maybe. Science: occasionally [PK / PD]
❝ I think regulators are sitting on much more comprehensive info than just the papers that are occasionally published. In fairness, sometimes regulators know stuff you and I don't...
Might be, but can't be CIs for Ctrough, as long as they didn't calculate it from historic data (submissions). But what should prevent them from sharing their knowledge at least at some conferences? Apocryphal knowledge can't be the basis for good decisions, although it's sharply on the rise, I know...
—
Kindest regards, nobody
Kindest regards, nobody
Complete thread:
- Lottery or science? nobody 2015-01-13 10:21
- Lottery or science? ElMaestro 2015-01-13 10:38
- Lottery or science? nobody 2015-01-13 10:45
- Lottery or science? ElMaestro 2015-01-13 11:05
- Lottery or science? nobody 2015-01-13 11:23
- Lottery: maybe. Science: no. Helmut 2015-01-13 13:50
- Lottery: maybe. Science: occasionally ElMaestro 2015-01-13 16:45
- Lottery: maybe. Science: occasionallynobody 2015-01-13 17:16
- Lottery: maybe. Science: no. nobody 2015-01-13 17:12
- post additional studies ElMaestro 2015-01-13 17:46
- post additional studies nobody 2015-01-13 18:28
- Historic abstract of Cmin in BE Helmut 2015-01-14 01:42
- Historic abstract of Cmin in BE nobody 2015-01-14 08:42
- post additional studies ElMaestro 2015-01-13 17:46
- Lottery: maybe. Science: occasionally ElMaestro 2015-01-13 16:45
- Lottery: maybe. Science: no. Helmut 2015-01-13 13:50
- Lottery or science? nobody 2015-01-13 11:23
- Lottery or science? ElMaestro 2015-01-13 11:05
- Lottery or science? nobody 2015-01-13 10:45
- Lottery or science? ElMaestro 2015-01-13 10:38
