Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Lottery or science? [PK / PD]

posted by nobody – 2015-01-13 11:45 (3770 d 03:24 ago) – Posting: # 14277
Views: 9,423

Yepp, it was bioequivalent. But is this a merrit of the formulation? Or was it purely by chance (if you have a look at the lower limit of the CI for Ctrough)? Or was it something else ?

Imagine that a slightly different trough value for ONE formulation in a SINGLE volunteer might have resulted in a lower limit of CI for Ctrough of 79.98%

Getting clearer now?

Complete thread:

• Lottery or science? nobody 2015-01-13 10:21 
  • Lottery or science? ElMaestro 2015-01-13 10:38
    • Lottery or science?nobody 2015-01-13 10:45
      • Lottery or science? ElMaestro 2015-01-13 11:05
        • Lottery or science? nobody 2015-01-13 11:23
          • Lottery: maybe. Science: no. Helmut 2015-01-13 13:50
            • Lottery: maybe. Science: occasionally ElMaestro 2015-01-13 16:45
              • Lottery: maybe. Science: occasionally nobody 2015-01-13 17:16
            • Lottery: maybe. Science: no. nobody 2015-01-13 17:12
              • post additional studies ElMaestro 2015-01-13 17:46
                • post additional studies nobody 2015-01-13 18:28
              • Historic abstract of Cmin in BE Helmut 2015-01-14 01:42
                • Historic abstract of Cmin in BE nobody 2015-01-14 08:42