scABE and missings [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2011-01-21 17:19 (5630 d 13:01 ago) – Posting: # 6478
Views: 34,692

Hi ElMaestro

❝ Correction: Sorry, I meant something else than I initially wrote. It is missing values that is the concern issue because of the difference between a normal linear model and the reml approach by a mixed model.


Good question! Next question please :-D.

To be honest: Don't know exactly. In the Progesterone guidance it is written "... Further assume that there are no missing observations ...". But only under the Heading "Example SAS Codes: fully replicated 4-way design".

My observation is that this guidance is in some instances rather vague or gives no sufficient explanation why what is done that way. Just to name "the unknown x = estimate2 - stderr2" or "use GLM for partial replicate and MIXED for full replicate".

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
116 visitors (0 registered, 116 guests [including 24 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:20 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists cannot simply hang their subjectivities
up on a hook outside the laboratory door.    Ruth Bleier

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5