Hyslop, Howe, scaled ABE and that all [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2011-01-21 16:28 (5210 d 17:32 ago) – Posting: # 6476
Views: 30,124

Dear ElMaestro,

❝ E&T's paper says they do simulations and evaluate the simulated data with a simplified method by Hyslop. The reference (Hyslop et al. 2000) which I don't have is about IBE rather than ABE. Do you have it? Can you shed light onto this?


See here and especially here for some discussions about how to calculate the scaled ABE criterion (linearized) including it's upper 95% CI according to Hyslop's method, sometimes the name Howe is also used.

The SAS code given in the FDA Progesterone guidance can be rewritten for R with not so much difficulties I think. But a full working version I don't have.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
76 visitors (0 registered, 76 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:00 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There are two possible outcomes: if the result confirms the
hypothesis, then you’ve made a measurement. If the result is
contrary to the hypothesis, then you’ve made a discovery.    Enrico Fermi

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5