Use of Cadmium [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2011-01-20 17:52 (5211 d 16:28 ago) – Posting: # 6461
Views: 30,135

Dear dlabes,

❝ Oh I see! But for what end?

❝ I understand the EMA widened acceptance ranges as applicable regardless of point estimate obtained.


A good point to make. On the other hand some people find pleasure in discussing if 0.760 is meaningful or if it should be 17 decimals. In this case I think it is a matter of doing what the guidelines says or doing what the guideline intends. I would expects this to be something you can discuss.

The code above does not assume anything other than what the ordinary (and widely accepted power routines) do. I envisage Helmut examining the acceptance range for T/R deviating from 1 and comparing it to the EMA curve and presenting such stuff at a conference. Heck if he doesn't do it, I will.

Here is a divide-and-conquer approach to the problem (simpler but not really faster :-D):
I_Eat_Cadmium2 <- function(P, TR, CV, alpha, N)
{
   AL3=0.9999;
   AL1=0.0001;

   while ((AL3-AL1)>0.000001)
    {
      AL2=0.5*(AL3+AL1); ##yes yes, I know, why not log midpoints etc...
      P1=Pwr223(N, alpha, AL1, 1/AL1, TR, CV);
      P2=Pwr223(N, alpha, AL2, 1/AL2, TR, CV);
      P3=Pwr223(N, alpha, AL3, 1/AL3, TR, CV);
     
      if ((P<P2) && (P>P3))
                 {
                   AL1=AL2;
                 } else AL3=AL2;
     
    }
   ##cat("Acc Lim Lo: ", AL2, "\n");
   ##cat("Acc Lim Hi: ", 1/AL2, "\n");
   AL2
}

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
70 visitors (0 registered, 70 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:20 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There are two possible outcomes: if the result confirms the
hypothesis, then you’ve made a measurement. If the result is
contrary to the hypothesis, then you’ve made a discovery.    Enrico Fermi

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5