... full precision is the question [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2011-01-17 17:37 (5267 d 15:36 ago) – Posting: # 6433
Views: 30,830

Dear Helmut,

I correct my code as following:

...
k <- (log(1.25)/CV2se(0.3))
if (CV>=0.3) theta1 <- exp(-k*CV2se(CVr)) else theta1 <- 0.8
# change k to 0.760 if you prefer to take the EMA guidance
# literally, carved in stone :cool: letter by letter and number by number
# ("kein Tüttelchen davon abweichen")

...


I do this because I wont take liability of collpasing bridges, derailing trains of Deutsche Bahn, etc. :-D

BTW: R
> options(digits=30)
Error in options(digits = 30) :
  invalid 'digits' parameter, allowed 1...22
> options(digits=22)
> pi
[1] 3.141592653589793
# only 16 digits!


I have learned in my early days during learning draftsman in agrar melioration engineering that 22/7=3.142857 is an good estimate. Very near to your 3.14! Maybe there were not so much circles involved, but more triangles and rectangles :-D.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,676 registered users;
39 visitors (0 registered, 39 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:13 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5