Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Dear Yung-jin and all others
I just installed BEAR 2.5.3 and tried to get used to it by recalculating a BE study: 18 subjects included, 17 completed the study, so the data set is inbalanced. When I look at the results in the files Statistical_summaries.txt and ANOVA_stat.txt I realized that there is a discrepancy:

Statistical_summaries.txt:
    Parameters  F values  P vales    PE (%)  lower 90%CI  upper 90%CI
1         Cmax     1.000    0.333         -            -            -
2       AUC0-t     0.176    0.681         -            -            -
3     AUC0-inf     0.133    0.720         -            -            -
4     ln(Cmax)     0.617    0.444    97.329       91.635      103.376
5   ln(AUC0-t)     0.001    0.975   100.003       96.217      103.938
6 ln(AUC0-inf)     0.003    0.957   100.227       95.924      104.724

ANOVA_stat.txt:
Cmax        97.334       91.641      103.382
AUC0-t      99.930       96.146      103.862
AUC0-inf   100.136       95.837      104.629

The calculation was performed at the same time using the same data set. Could you please explain why? I would have expected that they should be exactly the same. What is the reason for presenting different point estimators and confidence intervals?
I am looking forward to your reply
Kind regards
Dan