Type III SS sequence effect -revised [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2010-05-06 09:27 (5525 d 20:39 ago) – Posting: # 5307
Views: 24,777

Hi again,

❝ seq 0 0.000000 0.21364 -104.52


Since you ask I'd say this line is not informative; Seq will always have a zero (well, effectively zero) SS with type III when you are using R and drop1. SAS gives you another value for reasons explained above. So as you ask, I'd suggest to either remove the line completely or to prepare a type III SS for Seq the way SAS does. This is not because I endorse the SAS way of looking at things, rather it's just because as it is the anova table entry conveys no information.

Best regards
EM.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
47 visitors (0 registered, 47 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:07 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5