GLM = Equal variances [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2010-04-26 16:45 (5908 d 04:06 ago) – Posting: # 5234
Views: 68,303

Dear D. Labes and Yung-jin,

❝ Yesss Sir. But only if we assume equal variances within the groups.

❝ I do not have the power to know any way to get unequal variance assumption into Proc GLM.


❝ And at least the mighty FDA does not want it this way from us :no:.


FDA’s requirement is the justification for guideline-believers. I think it’s not by chance that FDA calls for procedures for unequal variances if they are available (specifically for parallel groups and replicate designs). Bad luck for 2×2 cross-overs (common variance part of the model).
IMHO good statistical practice would call for the Welsh-test; it’s also not by chance that var.equal = FALSE is the default in [image]’s t.test.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
175 visitors (0 registered, 175 guests [including 22 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:51 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5