Validating vs. WinNonlin... [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by yjlee168 Homepage – Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 2010-04-26 02:09 (5535 d 22:58 ago) – Posting: # 5219
Views: 62,416

Dear Helmut,

BTW, may I ask if the analysis of a replicate BE study is acceptable with WNL v5.x or v6.x? WNL uses a mixed effect model, too, to analyze a replicate BE.

❝ D. Labes referred to one of my old posts: WinNonlin's method (assuming equal variances) is flawed - even in the current releases WinNonlin 5.3 and Phoenix/WinNonlin 6.1.


All the best,
-- Yung-jin Lee
bear v2.9.2:- created by Hsin-ya Lee & Yung-jin Lee
Kaohsiung, Taiwan https://www.pkpd168.com/bear
Download link (updated) -> here

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,671 registered users;
41 visitors (0 registered, 41 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:08 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5