Validating vs. WinNonlin... [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by yjlee168 Homepage – Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 2010-04-26 02:09 (5480 d 19:49 ago) – Posting: # 5219
Views: 58,073

Dear Helmut,

BTW, may I ask if the analysis of a replicate BE study is acceptable with WNL v5.x or v6.x? WNL uses a mixed effect model, too, to analyze a replicate BE.

❝ D. Labes referred to one of my old posts: WinNonlin's method (assuming equal variances) is flawed - even in the current releases WinNonlin 5.3 and Phoenix/WinNonlin 6.1.


All the best,
-- Yung-jin Lee
bear v2.9.2:- created by Hsin-ya Lee & Yung-jin Lee
Kaohsiung, Taiwan https://www.pkpd168.com/bear
Download link (updated) -> here

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,668 registered users;
15 visitors (0 registered, 15 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:58 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It is true that many scientists are not philosophically minded
and have hitherto shown much skill and ingenuity
but little wisdom.    Max Born

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5