Modelling Parallel bears [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2010-04-25 22:40 (5883 d 20:58 ago) – Posting: # 5215
Views: 67,860

(edited on 2010-04-25 23:42)

Hi Bears,

❝ When I revised bear today, I found that the following two models got the same results (...)


The results are similar for the fixed effect (here: formulation). The relationship between the lm's residual and the lme's variance components is described above.

Now, just to add a little confusion:
D_labes pointed out some confusion about the results from the lme, but in my opinion there is also funny stuff going on with the lm: Negative adjusted r squared. Another cosmic mindf#&@er from the realm of statistics. I love it.

Best regards
EM.

PS: Yes, I am aware of the definitions, e.g. Wikipedia.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
368 visitors (0 registered, 368 guests [including 36 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:38 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5