Parallel groups in bear - CIs [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2010-04-23 11:09 (5911 d 14:15 ago) – Posting: # 5192
Views: 68,428

Dear Old saylor,

❝ In this case, I would be inclined to imagine that the error-sigma2 plus subject-sigma2 would equal the residual error from an anova on lm(lnAUC0t~drug) or something like that.


Full ACK.

To verify this (bear v 2.4.1 parallel group dataset):
'Mixed effects model'
Random effects:
 Formula: ~1 | subj
        (Intercept)  Residual
StdDev:   0.2396947 0.0898856   sqrt(0.2396947^2+ 0.0898856^2)=0.2559941

Fixed effects: lnAUC0t ~ drug
              Value  Std.Error DF  t-value p-value
(Intercept) 7.10189 0.08095245 18 87.72916  0.0000
drug2       0.01594 0.11448405 18  0.13923  0.8908


ElGrandeEM model:
Call:
lm(formula = lnAUC0t ~ drug, data = TotalData)

...

Coefficients:
            Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)   
(Intercept)  7.10189    0.08095  87.729   <2e-16 ***
drug2        0.01594    0.11448   0.139     0.89   

Residual standard error: 0.256 on 18 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: 0.001076,   Adjusted R-squared: -0.05442
F-statistic: 0.01939 on 1 and 18 DF,  p-value: 0.8908


Note the totally identical results for the 'drug' effects.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
301 visitors (0 registered, 301 guests [including 28 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:25 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5