Default in SAS [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2009-09-08 23:43 (5764 d 20:59 ago) – Posting: # 4174
Views: 8,747

Dear yjlee,

❝ O.k., does this sequential phenomenon occur with SAS for type I SS calculation? The suggested SAS codes for 2x2x2 crossover is

(...)

❝ Looks like that we need to put seq before subj...


Yes to the first question. Type I is defined that way, so you will see the same phenomenon with SAS type I (unless SAS is does something clever as it does for the single term deletion stuff; this I don't know about as I do not use SAS).

The SAS default I think includes type I and type III in the output. You can put Seq before Subj in type I analyses if you prefer. As explained previously that will ensure you get 'something' for the Seq SS.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,671 registered users;
43 visitors (0 registered, 43 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:42 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5