Default in SAS [🇷 for BE/BA]
Dear yjlee,
Yes to the first question. Type I is defined that way, so you will see the same phenomenon with SAS type I (unless SAS is does something clever as it does for the single term deletion stuff; this I don't know about as I do not use SAS).
The SAS default I think includes type I and type III in the output. You can put Seq before Subj in type I analyses if you prefer. As explained previously that will ensure you get 'something' for the Seq SS.
❝ O.k., does this sequential phenomenon occur with SAS for type I SS calculation? The suggested SAS codes for 2x2x2 crossover is
❝ Looks like that we need to put seq before subj...
Yes to the first question. Type I is defined that way, so you will see the same phenomenon with SAS type I (unless SAS is does something clever as it does for the single term deletion stuff; this I don't know about as I do not use SAS).
The SAS default I think includes type I and type III in the output. You can put Seq before Subj in type I analyses if you prefer. As explained previously that will ensure you get 'something' for the Seq SS.
—
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Complete thread:
- Imbalance + Type III SS = Tricky for the sequence evaluation ElMaestro 2009-09-07 21:16
- Imbalance + Type III SS = Tricky for the sequence evaluation yjlee168 2009-09-07 22:23
- Imbalance + Type III SS = Tricky for the sequence evaluation ElMaestro 2009-09-08 16:49
- Imbalance + Type III SS = Tricky for the sequence evaluation yjlee168 2009-09-08 20:02
- Sequential phenomena and some R code ElMaestro 2009-09-08 20:28
- Sequential phenomena and some R code yjlee168 2009-09-08 21:36
- Default in SASElMaestro 2009-09-08 21:43
- Sequential phenomena and some R code yjlee168 2009-09-08 21:36
- Sequential phenomena and some R code ElMaestro 2009-09-08 20:28
- Imbalance + Type III SS = Tricky for the sequence evaluation yjlee168 2009-09-08 20:02
- Imbalance + Type III SS = Tricky for the sequence evaluation ElMaestro 2009-09-08 16:49
- Imbalance + Type III SS = Tricky for the sequence evaluation yjlee168 2009-09-07 22:23