Let's skip the fancy nesting syntax! [🇷 for BE/BA]
Hi Yjlee,
I am not sure I understand your question.
If you talk about presenting a model matrix with Bear, I think you will have very few users actually wanting that. It is easy enough to get it printed, though, with the syntax above. It would be an OK option to have, I guess.
If this was not what you meant, then please rephrase.
Many thanks,
EM.
❝ Can the above descriptions be presented with .csv file or any format that can be ready-to-use? An example and R running outputs can be better. What do you think?
I am not sure I understand your question.
If you talk about presenting a model matrix with Bear, I think you will have very few users actually wanting that. It is easy enough to get it printed, though, with the syntax above. It would be an OK option to have, I guess.
If this was not what you meant, then please rephrase.
Many thanks,
EM.
Complete thread:
- Let's skip the fancy nesting syntax! ElMaestro 2009-08-26 20:54
- Let's skip the fancy nesting syntax! yjlee168 2009-08-26 22:29
- Let's skip the fancy nesting syntax! ElMaestro 2009-08-26 22:46
- Let's skip the fancy nesting syntax! yjlee168 2009-08-27 20:54
- Let's skip the fancy nesting syntax!ElMaestro 2009-08-27 22:14
- Let's skip the fancy nesting syntax! yjlee168 2009-08-27 20:54
- Let's skip the fancy nesting syntax! ElMaestro 2009-08-26 22:46
- Let's skip the fancy nesting syntax! yjlee168 2009-08-27 22:26
- Let's skip the fancy nesting syntax! ElMaestro 2009-08-27 22:46
- Simple solution ElMaestro 2009-08-27 23:53
- Simple solution yjlee168 2009-09-07 01:53
- Type III SS again ElMaestro 2009-09-07 15:47
- Type III SS again yjlee168 2009-09-07 18:08
- Type III SS again ElMaestro 2009-09-07 19:53
- Type III SS again yjlee168 2009-09-07 18:08
- Type III SS again ElMaestro 2009-09-07 15:47
- Simple solution yjlee168 2009-09-07 01:53
- Let's skip the fancy nesting syntax! yjlee168 2009-08-26 22:29