Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Bear to bear interval with 90% confidence

Bear to bear interval with 90% confidence [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by yjlee168 – Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 2009-04-06 09:50 (6283 d 14:00 ago) – Posting: # 3479
Views: 15,671

Dear EM,

❝ lm and lme should give you the same result for balanced and unbalanced

❝ 2,2,2-anova and 90% CI.

Exactly.

❝ If you get dissimilar results then try to force lme to exclude subjects

❝ with a mising period. I think it is via setting the na.action to "na.omit"

❝ or "na.exclude" or something like that. Not sure, not able to test it right

❝ now.[...]

We will try that later. Thank you so much.

—
All the best,
-- Yung-jin Lee
bear v2.9.6:- created by Hsin-ya Lee & Yung-jin Lee
Kaohsiung, Taiwan https://www.pkpd168.com/bear
Download link (updated) -> here

Complete thread:

Bear to bear interval with 90% confidence d_labes 2009-04-01 17:00
- Bear to bear interval with 90% confidence ElMaestro 2009-04-01 19:01
  - Bear to bear interval with 90% confidence yjlee168 2009-04-01 20:38
    - Bear to bear interval with 90% confidence ElMaestro 2009-04-01 21:28
- Bear to bear interval with 90% confidence yjlee168 2009-04-01 20:15
  - Bear to bear interval with 90% confidence ElMaestro 2009-04-01 21:47
    - Bear to bear interval with 90% confidence yjlee168 2009-04-04 23:11
      - Bear to bear interval with 90% confidence ElMaestro 2009-04-05 13:23
        
        Bear to bear interval with 90% confidenceyjlee168 2009-04-06 07:50
      - Data set d_labes 2009-04-07 08:46
        
        Data set yjlee168 2009-04-07 13:44
  - Models (not necessarily nice looking young woman) d_labes 2009-04-06 10:49
    - Models (not necessarily nice looking young woman) yjlee168 2009-04-07 14:05