Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Bear to bear interval with 90% confidence

Bear to bear interval with 90% confidence [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by ElMaestro – Denmark, 2009-04-05 15:23 (5867 d 05:45 ago) – Posting: # 3472
Views: 12,168

Hi,

lm and lme should give you the same result for balanced and unbalanced 2,2,2-anova and 90% CI.
If you get dissimilar results then try to force lme to exclude subjects with a mising period. I think it is via setting the na.action to "na.omit" or "na.exclude" or something like that. Not sure, not able to test it right now.
Alternatively, to be completely safe you could also simply cleanup the dataframe or dataset and remove the subject(s) in question. Depending on how you implement your derivation of LSMeans this might actually be a good option, avoiding perhaps some confusion.

Best regards
EM.

Complete thread:

Bear to bear interval with 90% confidence d_labes 2009-04-01 17:00
- Bear to bear interval with 90% confidence ElMaestro 2009-04-01 19:01
  - Bear to bear interval with 90% confidence yjlee168 2009-04-01 20:38
    - Bear to bear interval with 90% confidence ElMaestro 2009-04-01 21:28
- Bear to bear interval with 90% confidence yjlee168 2009-04-01 20:15
  - Bear to bear interval with 90% confidence ElMaestro 2009-04-01 21:47
    - Bear to bear interval with 90% confidence yjlee168 2009-04-04 23:11
      - Bear to bear interval with 90% confidenceElMaestro 2009-04-05 13:23
        
        Bear to bear interval with 90% confidence yjlee168 2009-04-06 07:50
      - Data set d_labes 2009-04-07 08:46
        
        Data set yjlee168 2009-04-07 13:44
  - Models (not necessarily nice looking young woman) d_labes 2009-04-06 10:49
    - Models (not necessarily nice looking young woman) yjlee168 2009-04-07 14:05