Preview: outlier detection with bear v2.1.0 [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by yjlee168 Homepage – Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 2008-12-11 19:38 (5982 d 04:24 ago) – Posting: # 2907
Views: 13,316

dear Helmut,

Thanks you for your encouragement.

❝ Which dataset are you using (I want to recalculate your results)?


The data we used to test "outlier function" was the one built-in in bear. So it should be easy to find out from previous version of bear (e.g., v2.0.1..) Plz wait just a few days after we release the new version.

❝ It maybe nice to flag values (i.e., give the subject's no.) in the QQ-plots which are outside +2sigma.


Exactly. We have started adding this (subject labellings) into the normal probability plots (Q-Q plots) before I posted the previous message in this Forum. Indeed it will be easier to identify outliers if it can be done so.

❝ Another suggestion would be a plot of ln(predicted) vs. studentized residuals. Such a plot allows the distinction between (...)


What a fantastic idea :ok:! In your slides, you even provide much more information about outlier detection than the textbook of Chow SH, Liu JP. "Design and Analysis of Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies", 3rd ed. (Chapman & Hall/Crc Biostatistics Series). Looks like that it's the great presentation :clap: you just made in India. Lucky audiences in that meeting. Just no budget to go this time ;-).

❝ (...)v2.0.1 the labels for time and conc are mixed up (pages 30-32). A suggestion would be to scale both spaghetti-plots (pages 30-31)(...)


Oops! it's funny mixed-up with labeling of x, y-axis. Yes, we will fix these soon. We want to thank you again for your valuable comments.

All the best,
-- Yung-jin Lee
bear v2.9.2:- created by Hsin-ya Lee & Yung-jin Lee
Kaohsiung, Taiwan https://www.pkpd168.com/bear
Download link (updated) -> here

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
130 visitors (0 registered, 130 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:02 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There are two possible outcomes: if the result confirms the
hypothesis, then you’ve made a measurement. If the result is
contrary to the hypothesis, then you’ve made a discovery.    Enrico Fermi

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5