Incomplete data, SAS9.2, DDF option residual [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2008-10-30 16:54 (6078 d 18:19 ago) – Posting: # 2612
Views: 33,636

Dear all,

after RTFM and reading tons of I-net places dealing with SAS Proc MIXED I am more confused as before.
For German speakers: "Da steh ich nun, ich armer Tor und bin genauso klug als wie zuvor!" (Johann W. von Goethe - Faust).

The only thing I could figure out was that DDFM=residual creates degrees of freedom which neglect totally the covariance structure of the random effects in the model. Not a good idea in case of data from x-over trials, I think.
But I couldn't figure out yet what this option is good for.

Interesting enough this DDFM was the default in SAS before Version 8. Thus users not aware of this had gotten inappropriate F-test!

For our data the consequence is: Simply forget it. The degrees of freedom are not appropriate anyhow. Full stop.


@for HS: Could it be that the DDF for the sequence effect was 22 instead of 21? Then WinNonlin method could be compared to SAS DDFM=contain or DDFM=betweenwithin.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
51 visitors (0 registered, 51 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:13 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5