Gold in discussion [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2008-10-29 10:56 (6079 d 20:47 ago) – Posting: # 2597
Views: 33,693

Dear ElMaestro,

full ACK with your points. At least for the classical 2x2 cross-over. See my two coins in the comment above.

A further justification: In Equivalence trials (and BE studies are a sort of, really ;-) ) the primary population usually is the per protocol population. We already had it here in this thread. And missing data are mostly the consequence of protocol deviations/violations.

❝ Please, please more discussions of this type.

❝ EM.

I also wish this. Really!

I know, time is spare with us. But YOU out there, do not follow "Talk is silver, silence is golden". Take silver. Gold is spare in the nowadays time of financial disasters over the world.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,671 registered users;
43 visitors (0 registered, 43 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:44 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5