Only balanced, crossover BE studies? [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2008-10-21 16:31 (6087 d 16:09 ago) – Posting: # 2573
Views: 70,795

Dear Yung-jin!

❝ Since bear now is designed only applicable to analyze data obtained

                      ^^^

❝ from a balanced, crossover BE study,

          ^^^

This would be a major flaw for bear because imbalanced BE studies (with respect to imbalanced number of volunteers in sequences) are more the rule than an exception!

This would mean that those studies cannot analyzed with bear!? :surprised:

In view of all the goodies implemented until now this would be a pity.
—
Regards,

Detlew
Thread locked

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,671 registered users;
42 visitors (0 registered, 42 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:41 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5