Type III SS in balanced, crossover BE studies? [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by yjlee168 Homepage – Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 2008-10-21 15:19 (6087 d 11:27 ago) – Posting: # 2572
Views: 70,899

Dear EM,

Since bear now is designed only applicable to analyze data obtained from a balanced, crossover BE study, that's why I ask if it is necessary to display Type III SS with Type I SS simultaneously for such a BE study at this moment. Currently, it seems not necessary to do that.

Thanks for your message.

❝ Whenever a study is balanced regulators will / should accept everything, because type I = type III (= type other, too). 99.999% don't care anyway, because they haven't got the faintest clue about statistics, as far as I've heard.

—
All the best,
-- Yung-jin Lee
bear v2.9.2:- created by Hsin-ya Lee & Yung-jin Lee
Kaohsiung, Taiwan https://www.pkpd168.com/bear
Download link (updated) -> here
Thread locked

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,671 registered users;
42 visitors (0 registered, 42 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:47 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5