AIC or ARS as the best fit criterion? [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2008-10-02 15:59 (6106 d 14:32 ago) – Posting: # 2466
Views: 70,971

Dear Yung-jin,

❝ [...] Now which criterion of the best fit should we use for the combo method? AIC or ARS? Looks like more people will vote for AIC, I guess. It should be implementable, too, with R. or both? Leave the option to the users to decide?


My personal choice is AIC, but with the full formula (see this message) to account for the varying number of data points.
Eventually the small sample AICc should be considered:
AICc=AIC + 2*p*(p+1)/(n-p-1)
    =AIC + 12/(n-3) with p=2
But with that n=3 is a problem (I have dealt with in an empirical manner).

But this is only an opinion. Therefore a choice from the user would be a good idea I think :yes:.
—
Regards,

Detlew
Thread locked

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
38 visitors (0 registered, 38 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:32 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5