speed? [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-04-30 14:38 (2225 d 14:09 ago) – Posting: # 21370
Views: 39,841

Hi Yung-jin,

❝ R v4.0.0 seems running faster on Windows …


Really? I removed 3.6.3 yesterday. If you still have it, can you do me a favor and perform a demanding check (sample size by 105 subject simulations for a partial replicate design with heterogenicity, the EMA’s approach of reference-scaling, assumed T/R-ratio 0.9, target power 0.8, five runs):

library(PowerTOST)
if (packageVersion("PowerTOST") < "1.4.8") {
  stop("Please install the latest version from CRAN.")
} else {
  CVp <- 0.4                                      # pooled CVw
  CV  <- signif(CVp2CV(CV = CVp, ratio = 2.5), 4) # CVwT > CVwR
  t   <- numeric(5)
  for (j in seq_along(t)) {
    t[j] <- system.time(sampleN.scABEL.sdsims(CV = CV, design = "2x3x3",
                                              progress = FALSE, details = FALSE,
                                              print = FALSE)[["Sample size"]])[3]   }
  cat(sprintf("%.2f seconds", median(t)), "\n")
}


BTW, I love that in 4.0.0 the default of stringsAsFactors was changed to FALSE.
Something I regularly forgot in imports or assigning data.frames. ;-)
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
462 visitors (0 registered, 462 guests [including 24 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:48 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5