implicit return? [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2019-04-28 21:36 (2594 d 00:22 ago) – Posting: # 20255
Views: 11,612

Hi Öberster Größter Meister,

❝ "smart" lost this round.


Totally.

❝ I always use explicit return(something) in my functions, when they are supposed to return a value regardless of whether it is a list, numeric, NULL or data frame some other thingy.


A good idea. But if you use R you are told that doing so has the penalty of a longer run-time.
Bloody Hell!

❝ Yes, that involves tapping a few times more on the keyboard but it does solve a lot of problems and best of all, it makes code readable.


Full ACK!

❝ In language like C you would never run into this phenomenon. You declare explicitly which type the function returns and you will be bombarded with errors or warnings if you fail to return the right type of if you forget the return statement. I find it very comfortable.


Weakly typed (R) against strong typed language (C or C++).
But IIRC has C or C++ also some weaknesses.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
137 visitors (0 registered, 137 guests [including 41 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:58 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5