Usage of function CVfromCI (package PowerTOST) [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by Elena777 – Belarus, 2018-01-20 12:13 (2651 d 12:51 ago) – Posting: # 18229
Views: 5,195

(edited on 2018-01-21 08:46)

Dear participants of forum, I am relatively new to R and RStudio. And I really need your advise to clear some questions up which are important for my self-education and professional skills.

1. A BE study of Sotalol HCl 160 mg tablets (Mylan) and Betapace 160 mg tablets (Berlex Laboratories) with standard 2x2 cross-over design was described in one of the applications on FDA (application number 75-725). They planned to enroll 24 subjects. But in fact that study was conducted with 23 subjects. I would like to calculate CV from CI using data of that study. What data should I write for arguments "n" and "design"? If I input such data:

CVfromCI(pe = 0.99, lower = 0.87, upper = 1.13, n = 23, design = "2x2", alpha = 0.05, robust=FALSE)

RStudio gives me a result but with the following note:

CVfromCI(pe = 0.99, lower = 0.87, upper = 1.13, n = 23, design = "2x2", alpha = 0.05, robust=FALSE)
Unbalanced 2x2 design. n(i)= 12/11 assumed.
[1] 0.2617363


Can I use this result for futher calculations of CVpooled by means of using PowerTOST or should I correct my data?

2. While calculating CV from CI with data from another study I`ve got the following result:

CVfromCI(pe = 0.96, lower = 0.9075, upper = 1.0089, n = 24, design = "2x2", alpha = 0.05, robust=FALSE)
[1] 0.1071475
Warning message:
sigma based on pe & lower CL more than 10% different than sigma based on pe & upper CL. Check input.


My input is correct because numbers are taken from that application not from my head. Should I pay attention to this warning message and can I use this result for futher calculations of CVpooled by PowerTOST?

3. While calculating CV from CI is it prefered to use CI for log-transformed parameters (for example LCmax) or for non-transformed parameters(Cmax)?


Big thanks in advance. :-)

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,669 registered users;
17 visitors (0 registered, 17 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:05 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It is a well-known experience that the only truly enjoyable and
profitable way of studying mathematics is the method of
“filling in details” by one’s own efforts.    Cornelius Lanczos

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5