Vd/F calculation in bear [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by yjlee168 Homepage – Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 2017-11-03 00:59 (2786 d 12:37 ago) – Posting: # 17966
Views: 5,449

Hi CECIF,

❝ I have been using bear for bioequivalence calculation since version 6.2.


uhh... since version 6.2? bear? the current version is 2.8.3 (as shown in my signature panel).

❝ ... on exception of some of the AUC0inf and AUC0t mostly on the last sampling times which came out a little higher in my calculations (I can only suposse it is because of the decimal numbers).


What was your selection for trapezoidal method? linear-up/log-down (default method) or all linear? That could make a little differences.

❝ ... I have been trying different equations to get it, but I failed in every one.

❝ is it Vd/F= D*Ka/(I(Ka-Ke))? with ka from the residuals method or the wagner-nelson method?

❝ or is it simply Vd/F=D/(AUC0inf*Ke)?


Simply Vd/F=D/(AUC0inf*Ke). Again please check your selected trapezoidal method. It also affects Vd/F too as you can see. What about Cl/F?

Hope this message can help.

All the best,
-- Yung-jin Lee
bear v2.9.2:- created by Hsin-ya Lee & Yung-jin Lee
Kaohsiung, Taiwan https://www.pkpd168.com/bear
Download link (updated) -> here

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,677 registered users;
40 visitors (0 registered, 40 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:36 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5