Vd/F calculation in bear [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2017-11-03 00:46 (2786 d 20:51 ago) – Posting: # 17965
Views: 5,512

Hi CECIF,

❝ […] the one parameter I have been struggling to get right in any way was Vd/F. Therefore I really need to ask what method bear uses to calculate it. […]


❝ or is it simply Vd/F=D/(AUC0inf*Ke)?


Exactly. The wonderful thing with open source is that you can perform a “whitebox” validation. With commercial software you can only perform a “blackbox” validation (rubbish in, rubbish out).

bear’s source code is available at
https://sourceforge.net/projects/yjlee-r-packages/files/bear/src/bear_2.8.3.tar.gz/download

Inspecting the script NCA.r you find in line 284
  VdFRef[j]<-Dose/(aucINF*ke)
and in line 520
  VdFTest[j]<-Dose/(aucINF*ke1)

Hope that helps.


PS: The same formula is used in Phoenix/WinNonlin.
PPS: IMHO, the “volume of distribution” after an extravascular dose (if no i.v. dose was administered in the same study) bears [pun!] limited – if any – meaning. Since F is unknown, what’s the purpose of reporting V/F?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,674 registered users;
51 visitors (0 registered, 51 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:38 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5