PROC GLM fixes Subject [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by kumarnaidu – Mumbai, India, 2016-11-07 13:42 (3149 d 00:59 ago) – Posting: # 16785
Views: 24,196

Thanks Mittyri,

❝ yes, you can.

❝ I kindly suggest to review the statistical part of the protocol with statistician experienced in BEQ studies evaluation. It would be useful for you, for this study and for the product.

The confusion arises due to the difference in the opinion :-D. Some CRO stat experts says all effects in the above program are fixed and some says that sub(seq) cannot be a fixed because we are test seq against this. Also the EMA guidance says that all effects are fixed in the Method A (PROC GLM).

Kumar Naidu

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
64 visitors (0 registered, 64 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:42 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5