PROC GLM fixes Subject [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by kumarnaidu – Mumbai, India, 2016-11-07 07:24 (3512 d 13:45 ago) – Posting: # 16783
Views: 27,455

Dear Mittyri and all,

❝ Are you working with Replicate study? The things are different there


Its a 2x2 crossover study.

❝ I think you can provide the SAS code above, so all experts will understand that all effects are still fixed, and the reason of random part there is just an F test.


proc glm data=replicate;
class formulation subject period sequence;
model logDATA= sequence subject (sequence) period formulation;
estimate "test-ref" formulation -1+1;
test h=sequence e=subject(sequence);
lsmeans formulation / adjust=t pdiff=control("R") CL alpha=0.10;
run;

This is Method A from EMA Q&A guidance. Ideally in GLM all effects are fixed.
Can we call here sub(seq) as a fixed effect?

Kumar Naidu

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
134 visitors (0 registered, 134 guests [including 26 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:10 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5