PROC GLM fixes Subject [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by mittyri  – Russia, 2016-11-05 00:00 (3498 d 21:35 ago) – Posting: # 16774
Views: 27,361

Dear Kumar,

I would cite one of our Gurus:
You will also see that in FDA's code for 222BE which is based on PROC GLM there is a random statement pertaining to subject. One should think this means we are now asking PROC GLM to add a random effect (and thus to analyse as a mixed model), perhaps. It doesnt, though. PROC GLM with the random statement for subject still treats subject as a fixed effect. The bogus statement achieves another goal and compares sequence against the subject MS

*--- GLM evaluation, output of T-R;
ODS output estimates=_est;
title "&file - GLM evaluation";
ods exclude  ExpectedMeanSquares;
Proc GLM data=PKmetric;
  class trt per seq subj;
  model logvar=trt per seq subj(seq)/CLparm alpha=&al2;
  random subj(seq)/test;
  estimate 'T-R' trt -1 1;
run; quit;

*--- back-transformation;
title "&file - &Ominus2al.% confidence intervals, back-transformed";
data _est;
  set _est;
  pe=exp(estimate);
  lower=exp(lowerCL);
  upper=exp(upperCL);
run;

Seems to be odd but here Subject is still fixed as ElMaestro wrote. So the experts are right (and ElMaestro too:-D)

Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
467 visitors (0 registered, 467 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:35 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5