Validation of software for BE [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2016-08-26 13:20 (3221 d 03:10 ago) – Posting: # 16582
Views: 5,372

Salam Mahmoud,

❝ […] our local regulatory authority […] want a validation proof for that package and program.


Understandable after the Kinetica-disaster (which was very popular in the Middle East).

❝ Can anyone of our forum experts advise me on how to supply the proof for that request.


I suggest to compare bear’s results with the ones in other software packages. We published two papers on the topic in order to support users in validation.1,2 Following the PMC-links in PubMed the reference datasets are available.

Good luck!


  1. Schütz H , Detlew Labes D , Fuglsang A. Reference Datasets for 2-Treatment, 2-Sequence, 2-Period Bioequivalence Studies. AAPS J. 2014;16(6):1292–7. doi:10.1208/s12248-014-9661-0. PMID 25212768. [image] free resource.
  2. Fuglsang A, Schütz H , Detlew Labes D . Reference Datasets for Bioequivalence Trials in a Two-Group Parallel Design. AAPS J. 2015;17(2):400–4. doi:10.1208/s12248-014-9704-6. PMID 25488055. [image] free resource.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
41 visitors (0 registered, 41 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:30 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5