Correct input data to re-calculate results of 3x3x3 study using lm() [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by yjlee168 Homepage – Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 2016-08-25 12:29 (3221 d 14:35 ago) – Posting: # 16574
Views: 6,827

Dear VStus,

Thanks for sharing your approach here. This looks great. So how were the results obtained from running your R codes compared with that from SAS PROC GLM by CRO?

❝ Recently, I've faced a limitation in bear's functionality in regards to statistical analysis of Latin squares studies (3x3x3 and 4x4x4: pilot, development studies). I was asked to analyze C24; Cmax and AUC0t were used as internal validation versus results provided by CRO (SAS PROC GLM).


All the best,
-- Yung-jin Lee
bear v2.9.2:- created by Hsin-ya Lee & Yung-jin Lee
Kaohsiung, Taiwan https://www.pkpd168.com/bear
Download link (updated) -> here

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
42 visitors (0 registered, 42 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:04 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5