Geometric means ± SD [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2016-01-27 14:51 (3432 d 20:53 ago) – Posting: # 15866
Views: 26,752

Hi ElMaestro & Lizhao,

❝ ❝ If I want to plot a mean plot (mean and error bars) of a crossover biequivalence study, should I use within-subject confidence intervals or between-subject confidence intervals?


❝ I think you can plot those curves in any way you want? The BE decision is taken on basis of the CI's.

❝ If you plot Conc versus time and average across subjects then you would often choose to use between-subject variances for error bars.


Between – yes. (m/V)2? Ahem…
I suggest to plot geometric means* ± backtransformed standard deviations. Concentrations likely follow a log-normal distribution. Arithmetic means ± SD can lead to bizarre plots (like this one published by the FDA, page 12 of the PDF).



Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
92 visitors (0 registered, 92 guests [including 60 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:45 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5