Comparison of normality tests [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by BE-proff – 2015-08-10 11:07 (3603 d 00:20 ago) – Posting: # 15206
Views: 19,101

Hi All,

Quite interesting article about comparison of normality tests is available at https://noppa.aalto.fi/noppa/kurssi/becs-114.5501/materiaali/Becs-114_5501_normality_tests_comparison.pdf

But one thing worries: the article concludes that all tests are rather weak if sample size is below 30. :-(

What to think about BE-studies with samples 18, 24? :confused:


Edit: Category changed from General statistics. Since the second reply I think that this category fits better. [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
95 visitors (0 registered, 95 guests [including 54 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:27 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5