Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Comparison of normality tests

Comparison of normality tests [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by BE-proff – 2015-08-10 11:07 (3960 d 07:51 ago) – Posting: # 15206
Views: 21,808

Hi All,

Quite interesting article about comparison of normality tests is available at https://noppa.aalto.fi/noppa/kurssi/becs-114.5501/materiaali/Becs-114_5501_normality_tests_comparison.pdf

But one thing worries: the article concludes that all tests are rather weak if sample size is below 30. :-(

:-(

What to think about BE-studies with samples 18, 24? :confused:

:confused:

Edit: Category changed from General statistics. Since the second reply I think that this category fits better. [Helmut]

Complete thread:

Comparison of normality testsBE-proff 2015-08-10 09:07
- To test or not to test… Helmut 2015-08-11 01:21
  - To test or not to test… BE-proff 2015-08-11 10:06
    - R packages/libraries Helmut 2015-08-11 12:07
      - R packages/libraries BE-proff 2015-08-11 12:29
        
        R packages/libraries Helmut 2015-08-11 13:18
        
        R packages/libraries BE-proff 2015-08-11 22:15
        
        R packages/libraries Helmut 2015-08-11 22:28
        
        R packages/libraries BE-proff 2015-08-11 22:39
        
        R packages/libraries d_labes 2015-08-12 09:07
        
        R packages/libraries BE-proff 2015-08-12 10:36
        
        R packages/libraries install d_labes 2015-08-12 11:13
        
        install package(s) from a local zip file? yjlee168 2015-08-12 11:43
        
        install package(s) from a local zip file? BE-proff 2015-08-12 12:06
        install package(s) d_labes 2015-08-12 13:02
        
        Packages attached by default Helmut 2015-08-12 13:13
        install package(s) yjlee168 2015-08-12 14:58
        
        suggested package(s) d_labes 2015-08-12 16:33
        
        R packages/libraries install BE-proff 2015-08-12 11:57
        
        I don't believe!!! BE-proff 2015-08-12 18:26
        
        Congratulation d_labes 2015-08-13 08:36

Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
95 visitors (0 registered, 95 guests [including 30 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:58 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To propose that poor design can be corrected by subtle analysis techniques
is contrary to good scientific thinking. Stuart J. Pocock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz