not a good idea for incomplete replicate data [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by jerry – Russia, 2015-07-11 18:02 (3632 d 23:57 ago) – Posting: # 15069
Views: 5,935

❝ Did you try to perform NCA analysis in Bear for 1 subject? I think Bear was a little bit confused with sequence.


Yes, mittyri. i performed analysis only for 1 subject(#2) and i think that man did so. Maybe he did analysis for all 24 subjects separately. Do you consider that error concerned with it? I should use not only one subject?

❝ ❝ did i correct change 0 for Cmax on NA?

❝ I didn't understand where and what did you change. As you cited Bear manual "near the end of sampling time and is below LLOQ... input these data values as 'NA'..." Cmax cannot be changed to NA, isn't it?


If I understood correctly, if Cmax=0 and Cmax < LLOQ i can delete entire row. the row consist of 6 digits (subject,seq,prd,tmt, t,conc

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
39 visitors (0 registered, 39 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:00 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5