not a good idea for incomplete replicate data [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by mittyri  – Russia, 2015-07-11 00:51 (3981 d 22:45 ago) – Posting: # 15066
Views: 6,899

Hi Jerry!

I didn't have sufficient time to answer to your previous post. It's solved by yourself and it's very good ;-)

About your current problem:
On this forum you can find some discussions about Bear's features.
At this moment I wouldn't recommend you to use Bear for replicate studies with incomplete data (there are some skipped periods in your data - see subjs #18 & 19)
The Bear is a very good package, BTW it is not validated by now and has some known bugs and restrictions (so pity...)

Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
478 visitors (0 registered, 478 guests [including 41 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:36 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5