not a good idea for incomplete replicate data [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by mittyri  – Russia, 2015-07-11 00:51 (3632 d 03:11 ago) – Posting: # 15066
Views: 5,932

Hi Jerry!

I didn't have sufficient time to answer to your previous post. It's solved by yourself and it's very good ;-)

About your current problem:
On this forum you can find some discussions about Bear's features.
At this moment I wouldn't recommend you to use Bear for replicate studies with incomplete data (there are some skipped periods in your data - see subjs #18 & 19)
The Bear is a very good package, BTW it is not validated by now and has some known bugs and restrictions (so pity...)

Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,677 registered users;
42 visitors (0 registered, 42 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:02 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5