ANOVA F-test results and regulators [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2015-06-12 17:44 (3661 d 10:50 ago) – Posting: # 14953
Views: 14,740

Huummmm,

❝ Why not just always fit the model with no intercept and type I. The first term is almost guaranteed to have a significant P-value. You can then discuss it as much as you feel like at the nuisance level. Specify Sequence first, and voila here's a nice discussion brewing already :-D You can have a standard answer ready for all procedures.


Didn't get your point. Can you elaborate in slow motion and simple words?

As I see it you can't discuss with regulators that their request is nuisance aka crap aka nonsense. Not if you have to discuss a submission.
Only if you meet one at conferences and have forgotten to take your pills ... :-D

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
35 visitors (0 registered, 35 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:34 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5