ANOVA F-test results and regulators [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2015-06-12 17:29 (4021 d 12:32 ago) – Posting: # 14951
Views: 17,151

Hmmmm,

❝ We received then and when (not so seldom!) questions about the ANOVA F-test results. Up to the request to comment significant results even for the treatment effects, of no relevance in case of BE studies of course.

❝ Nasty the requests to comment the "validity" of the BE evaluation if period and/or sequence effects are found significant. As they many times come out if Type I tests will be applied, especially for sequence.


Why not just always fit the model with no intercept and type I. The first term is almost guaranteed to have a significant P-value. You can then discuss it as much as you feel like at the nuisance level. Specify Sequence first, and voila here's a nice discussion brewing already :-D You can have a standard answer ready for all procedures.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
139 visitors (0 registered, 139 guests [including 24 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:01 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Always listen to experts.
They’ll tell you what can’t be done and why.
Then do it.    Robert A. Heinlein

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5