ANOVA F-test results and regulators [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2015-06-12 17:29 (3660 d 20:59 ago) – Posting: # 14951
Views: 14,727

Hmmmm,

❝ We received then and when (not so seldom!) questions about the ANOVA F-test results. Up to the request to comment significant results even for the treatment effects, of no relevance in case of BE studies of course.

❝ Nasty the requests to comment the "validity" of the BE evaluation if period and/or sequence effects are found significant. As they many times come out if Type I tests will be applied, especially for sequence.


Why not just always fit the model with no intercept and type I. The first term is almost guaranteed to have a significant P-value. You can then discuss it as much as you feel like at the nuisance level. Specify Sequence first, and voila here's a nice discussion brewing already :-D You can have a standard answer ready for all procedures.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,677 registered users;
43 visitors (0 registered, 43 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:28 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5