lme() with NA in R [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by yjlee168 Homepage – Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 2015-04-20 01:44 (4078 d 14:03 ago) – Posting: # 14710
Views: 33,152

Dear Elmaestro and Helmut,

I like to correct what I have said about lme() with NA. We can use lme(..., na.action=na.exclude) if there are some NA in dataset. Looks like this option can avoid crash if we do not omit NA. Sounds great.

any NA must be removed (as the entire period) first before doing lme(); otherwise, it will crash.[/list] So there is no way to compare the difference.


All the best,
-- Yung-jin Lee
bear v2.9.6:- created by Hsin-ya Lee & Yung-jin Lee
Kaohsiung, Taiwan https://www.pkpd168.com/bear
Download link (updated) -> here
Thread locked

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
161 visitors (0 registered, 161 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:47 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Actually, science starts to become interesting
only where it ends.    Justus von Liebig

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5